АНАЛИЗ ОШИБОК ОСТЕОСИНТЕЗА ПЕРЕЛОМОВ КОНЕЧНОСТЕЙ

A.M. Tashmatov; B.Sh. Ermatov; M.A. Aitymbetov

doi:10.54890/1694-8882-2024-4-195

A.M. Tashmatov B.Sh. Ermatov M.A. Aitymbetov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54890/1694-8882-2024-4-195

Abstract

The authors studied the results of osteosynthesis in 96 patients with ununited fractures and pseudoarthrosis of long bones of the skeleton who received treatment in the traumatology department of the KBSMP. Of these, 54 (51.84%) were men, 42 (40.32%) were women, their age ranged from 14 to 70 years. An analysis of the mistakes made and recommendations for their prevention were carried out.
Errors that occur during the treatment of patients with limb fractures are a common cause of unfavorable outcomes. Despite the special attention of specialist doctors, the number of errors and complications does not decrease. After unwanted doctor mistakes, the most frequently developing complication leading to disability is: formation of a pseudarthrosis, failure of metal osteosynthesis due to migration or fracture of the fixator, development of osteomyelitis with subsequent bone defect, post-traumatic arthrosis with joint stiffness (post-traumatic contracture).

Keywords:

fracture, ununited fracture, pseudarthrosis, osteosynthesis error, bone plate, post- traumatic contracture, recommendations

Author Biographies

A.M. Tashmatov, Kyrgyz State Medical Academy named after I.K. Akhunbaev

Department of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Extreme Surgery

B.Sh. Ermatov, Kyrgyz State Medical Academy named after I.K. Akhunbaev

Department of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Extreme Surgery

M.A. Aitymbetov, Kyrgyz State Medical Academy named after I.K. Akhunbaev

Department of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Extreme Surgery

References

1. Волна А.А. Принципы АО/ ASIF. Современная травматология и ортопедия. 2010;6:57-63.

2. Harwood PJ, Giannoudis PV, van Griensven M. Alterations in the systemic inflammatory response afterearly total care and damage control procedures for femoral shaft fracture in severely injured patients. J. Trauma. 2005;8:446-454.

3. Pape HC, Grimme K, van Griensven M, Sott AH, Giannoudis P, Morley J, et al. Impact of intramedullary instrumentation versus damage control for femoral fractures on immunoinflammatory parameters: proapective randomized analysis by the EPOFF Study Group. J Trauma. 2003;55(1):7-13. https://doi.org/10.1097/ 01.TA.0000075787.69695.4E

4. Bone LB, Johnson KD, Weigelt J, Scheinberg R. Early versus delayed stabilization of femoral fractures: a prospective randomized study. 1989. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;(422):11-16.

5. Анаркулов Б.С. Пластины с угловой стабильностью (LCP) и опыт их применения. Медицина Кыргызстана. 2012;3:59-62.

6. Todd CJ, Freeman CJ, Camilleri-Ferrante C, Palmer CR, Hyder A, Laxton CE, et al. Differences in mortality after fracture of hip: the east Anglian audit. BMJ.1995 ;310(6984) :904-908. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.310.6984.904

7. Ташматов А.М. Тактико-технические ошибки оперативного лечения переломов костей конечностей. Вестник КГМА им. И.К. Ахунбаева. 2015;1:118-120.