URETHRAL PLASTIC IN PATIENTS WITH PROXYMAL FORMS OF HYPOSPADIAS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54890/.v3i3.934Abstract
In the work were presented the results of surgical treatment of 96 patients with paroxysmal forms
of hypospadias, aged from 3 to 26 years. Of all patients, we divided into 3 groups: the first group of 30 patients was operated with the method of buccalurethroplasty in the modification of the clinic, the second group of 35 patients was operated by the Dupley method and the third group of 31 patients were operated using the Landerer method. In the analysis of complications in 3 groups of patients, the next were established, we noted both early and late postoperative complications. The main complications that have been observed in patients are: urethral fistulas, hair growth in the urethral lumen, urethritis and the remote postoperative period there was psychogenic erectile dysfunction. Summing up the evaluation of the results of surgical treatment of hypospadias, it is important to note the next. Using three techniques for surgical correction of hypospadias, we obtained a significantly greater number of complications in the Dupley and Landerer operation compared with the operation of buccalurethroplasty with the use of a continuous screw-in sealed joint.
Keywords:
Urethroplasty, Hypospadias.References
1. Каганцов И.М. Модификация пластики уретры тубуляризированной рассечённой уретральной площадкой при лечении гипоспадии у детей // Ан-дрол. и генитал. хир. - 2010. - №4. - С. 87-91.
2. Москалева Н., Рудин Ю., Яровой С. Лечение гипо-спадии у детей// Врач. 2013. - №1. С. 8-12.
3. Шарабидзе Г.Г. Пред- и послеоперационное лече-ние мальчиков с гипоспадией // Автреф. УФА-2010. С. 23.
4. Эсембаев Б.И. Методы отведения мочи уретральным способом у детей с гипоспадией // Вестник КГМА. 2013. - №4. С.46-48.
5. Baskin L.S. Hypospadias: a critical analysis of cos-metic outcomes using photography. Br. J. Urol. Int. 2001; 87: 534—9.-
6. Baskin L.S., Erol A., Li Y. et al. Urethral seam for-mation and hypospadias. Cell Tissue Res. 2001; 305: 379-87.
7. Barbagli G., Palminteri E., Guazzoni G. et al. One-stage and multi-stage penile urethroplasty in 60 adult patients after failed hypospadias repair: com-parison between penile skin and buccal mucosa grafts // J. Urol. 2005. Vol. 173. P. 89 (abs. 322).
8. Belman A. B. Hypospadias and chordee. Clinical pediatric urology. – Martin Dunitz, 2002. Р. 1061–1092.
9. Laurence S., Baskin L.S., Michele B. Ebbers Hypo-spadias: anatomy, etiology, and technique. J. Pedi-atr. Surg. 2006; 41 (3): 463-72.
10. Snodgrass W., Villanueva C., Bush N.C. Duration of follow-up to diagnose hypospadias urethroplasty complications // J. Pediatr. Urol. 2014. Vol. 10 (2). P. 208-211.
11. Tsutomu, Ogata. A New Gene Involved in Hypo-spadias / Ogata Tsutomu, Jocelyn Laporte, Maki Fu-kami // HO RMONE RESEA RCH. - 2009. - Vol; 71:245-252.