ОПЫТ ЛАПАРОСКОПИЧЕСКИХ ОПЕРАЦИЙ  В РЕСПУБЛИКАНСКОМ НАУЧНОМ ЦЕНТРЕ УРОЛОГИИ КЫРГЫЗСКОЙ РЕСПУБЛИКИ

A.Ch.  Usupbaev; N.K.  Monolov; A.T.  Adiev

doi:10.54890/.v3i3.806

A.Ch. Usupbaev N.K. Monolov A.T. Adiev

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54890/.v3i3.806

Abstract

The purpose of our research was studying efficiency of laparoscopic methods of a belly cavity surgery.

Advantages of laparoscopic operations are obvious - less traumatism, a significant reduction in postoperative complications and the terms of rehabilitation of patients, if necessary, the possibility of simultaneous surgery on the urinary tract.

Keywords:

kidneycyst, laparoscopic methods of treatment, urolitiasis.

Author Biographies

A.Ch. Usupbaev, Kyrgyz State Medical Academy named after I.K. Akhunbaev

Department of Urology and Andrology named after M.T. Tinaliev

N.K. Monolov, Kyrgyz State Medical Academy named after I.K. Akhunbaev

Department of Urology and Andrology named after M.T. Tinaliev

A.T. Adiev , Kyrgyz State Medical Academy named after I.K. Akhunbaev

Department of Urology and Andrology named after M.T. Tinaliev

References

1. Кадыров З.А., Самко А.А., Гурбанов Ш.Ш. и др. Эндовидеохирургические методы иссечения простых кист почек .// Экспериментальная и клиническая урология.-2010.- №3. С. 62-65.

2. Лялов К.В., Стойко Ю.М., Лосев С.В. и др. Наш опыт применения лапароскопических операций в урологии. //Эндоскопическая хирургия, приложение. -2003.–С. 94-95.

3. Минин О.Г., Зайцев А.Н., Сауткин К.М. Наш начальный опыт лапароскопического лечения урологических операций. //Эндоскопическая хирургия, приложение. -2003.-No3. –С. 101-105.

4. Руководство по урологии /Под ред. Н. А. Лопаткина. – М.: Медицина, 1998.– Т. 3.– 765 с.

5. Brown J.A., Hubosky S.G., Gomella L.G. et al. Hand assisted laparoscopic partial. Nephrectomy for peripheral and central lesions: a review of 30 consecu-tive cases. // J. Urol. (Baltimore) 2004; 171: P.1443-1446.

6. Fahlenkamp D, Rassweiler J, Fornara P, Frede T, Loening SA. Complications of laparoscopic procedures in urology: experience with 2,407 procedures at 4 German centers. J Wu/1999; 162: 765-71.

7. Gaston K.Z., Moore D.Т., Pruihi R.S. et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy: prospective evaluation of the learning curve. //J. Urol. (Baltimore) 2004; 171: P.63-67.

8. Healy KA, Ogan K. Nonsurgical management of urolithiasis: an overview of expulsive therapy. J Urol 2005; 19:759-67.

9. Krecher K.W., Heniford В.Т., Matthews B.D. et al. Laparoscopic vs open nephrectomy in 210 consecutive patients. Outcomes, cost, and changes in practice patterns. // Surg. Endosc. 2003; 17: P.1889-1895.

10. Lee S.Z., Kwak С et al. Hand assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: comparison with open radical nephrectomy.//J. Urol. (Baltimore) 2003; 170: P.756-759.

11. Lotan Y., Duchene D.A., Cadeddu J.A. et al. Cost comparison of hand assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy and open nephrectomy: analysis of individual parameters. //J. Urol. (Baltimore) 2003; 170: P.752-755.

12. Munver R., Del Pizzo J., Sosa E. The advantages of hand assisted laparoscopy // Endourology. 2004; 5:P.100-107.

13. Nakada S.К., Fadden P., Jarrard D.F., Moon T.D. Hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: comparison to open radical nephrectomy. //Urology 2001; 58: P.517-520.

14. Patel V.R., Leveillee R.J. Hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy for stage T1 and large stage T2 renal tumors. //J. Endourol.2003; 17 (6): P.379-383.

15. Posner M.С., Alverdy J. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgerv for cancer. //Cancer J. 2002; 8 (2): P.144-153.