ВЫЯВЛЕНИЕ МЕТАСТАТИЧЕСКИХ ПОРАЖЕНИЙ ПОЗВОНОЧНИКА В ЗАВИСИМОСТИ ОТ ЛОКАЛИЗАЦИИ ПЕРВИЧНОЙ ОПУХОЛИ

K.B. Yrysov; D.J. Zhoobasarova; I.T. Ydyrysov

doi:10.54890/1694-8882-2024-3-156

K.B. Yrysov D.J. Zhoobasarova I.T. Ydyrysov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54890/1694-8882-2024-3-156

Abstract

Metastatic damage to organs and tissues is one of the main problems in the treatment of oncological diseases. Along with traditional metastasis to regional lymph nodes, metastatic lesions in distant organs and systems can be detected. Of crucial importance is the metastatic involvement of the skeleton, which is the third organ in terms of the frequency of lesion localization, after the lungs and liver. The purpose of the work is to analyze the results of diagnosis and treatment of patients with metastatic spinal lesions.
Material and methods. The paper presents an analysis of research materials conducted from 2008 to 2023 in the Osh region. Based on the data obtained, the frequency of metastatic spinal lesions in cancer of various localizations, the timing of their detection depending on the detection of the primary tumor, and the features of clinical manifestations were analyzed. The frequency of localization of metastases in various parts of the spine, methods of their diagnosis and treatment explored.
Results. In patients with identified primary tumors (n=66), signs of metastatic spinal lesions were diagnosed at various times after the diagnosis of the primary tumor. Thus, in 16 patients (24.2%), they were detected within 6 months, in 18 patients (27.3%) – from 1 to 3 years, in 7 patients (10.6%) – after 4-5 years.
Conclusion. For early and timely detection of metastatic spinal lesions, the most optimal algorithm for examining patients is needed. Mandatory magnetic resonance imaging of the spine in order to detect changes in soft tissues, computed tomography of the spine to identify pathological changes in the bone structure.

Keywords:

primary tumor, metastatic lesions of the spine, pain syndrome, diagnosis, treatment.

Author Biography

K.B. Yrysov, Kyrgyz State Medical Academy named after I.K. Akhunbaev

Department of Neurosurgery for undergraduate and postgraduate education

References

1. Araujo JL, Veiga JC, Figueiredo EG, Barboza VR, Daniel JW, Panagopoulos AT. Management of metastatic spinal column neoplasms – an update. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2013;40(6):508-514. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-69912013000600015

2. Liang Y, Liu P, Jiang LB, Wang HL, Hu AN, Zhou XG, et al. Value of CT-guided Core Needle Biopsy in Diagnosing Spinal Lesions: A Comparison Study. Orthop Surg. 2019;11(1):60-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12418

3. Tang S, Zuo J, Zhang H, Wu Z, Liang B. Spinal Metastatic Melanoma with Unknown Primary Lesions Presenting as Radiculopathy: Case Report and Literature Review. World Neurosurg. 2020;140:320-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.wneu.2020.05.067

4. Rosian K., Hawlik K., Piso B. Efficacy Assessment of Radiofrequency Ablation as a Palliative Pain Treatment in Patients with Painful Metastatic Spinal Lesions: A Systematic Review. Pain Physician. 2018;21(5):E467-E476.

5. Araujo AO, Narazaki DK, Teixeira WGJ, Ghilardi CS, Araujo PHXN, Zerati AE, et al. En bloc vertebrectomy for the treatment of spinal lesions. Five years of experience in a single institution: a case series. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2018;73:e95. https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2018/e95

6. Kaloostian PE, Zadnik PL, Etame AB, Vrionis FD, Gokaslan ZL, Sciubba DM. Surgical management of primary and metastatic spinal tumors. Cancer Control. 2014;21(2):133-139. https://doi.org/10.1177/107327481402100205

7. Мягков С.А. Методические аспекты и современные модальности магнитно-резонансной томографии в диагностике метастатических компрессионных переломов позвоночника. Запорожский медицинский журнал. 2014;2(83):61-71.

8. Жообасарова Д.Ж. Частота метастатических поражений позвоночника при различных локализациях первичных опухолей. Нейрохирургия и неврология Казахстана. 2015;1(38):24–32.

9. Слынько Е. И., Аль-Кашкиш И.И., Пастушин А.И. Результаты нейрохирургического лечения опухолей позвоночника. Ukrainian Neurosurgical Journal. 2013;4:12-17.

10. Rai SS, Goulart C, Gokaslan Z, Galgano M. Tandem Thoracic Spinal Cord Lesions of Differing Pathologies: Concurrent Metastatic Lung Adenocarcinoma Lesion in Close Proximity to a Intradural Meningioma. Cureus. 2020;12(1):e6646. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6646

11. Anchala PR, Irving WD, Hillen TJ, Friedman MV, Georgy BA, Coldwell DM, et al. Treatment of metastatic spinal lesions with a navigational bipolar radiofrequency ablation device: a multicenter retrospective study. Pain Physician. 2014;17(4):317-27.

12. Goodwin CR, Sankey EW, Liu A, Abu-Bonsrah N, Elder BD, Rhee J, et al. Primary lesion location influences postoperative survival in patients with metastatic colorectal spinal lesions. J Clin Neurosci. 2016;25:84-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2015.10.005

13. Chmelik J, Jakubicek R, Walek P, Jan J, Ourednicek P, Lambert L, et al. Deep convolutional neural network-based segmentation and classification of difficult to define metastatic spinal lesions in 3D CT data. Med Image Anal. 2018;49:76-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2018.07.008

14. Sullivan PZ, Niu T, Abinader JF, Syed S, Sampath P, Telfeian A, et al. Evolution of surgical treatment of metastatic spine tumors. J Neurooncol. 2022;157(2):277-283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-022-03982-0

15. Guarnieri G, Izzo R, Muto M. Current trends in mini-invasive management of spine metastases. Interv Neuroradiol. 2015;21(2):263-272. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1591019915582366