ANALYSIS OF MORTALITY IN THE NEUROSURGICAL SERVICE IN SOME REGIONS OF KAZAKHSTAN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54890/1694-8882-2024-3-140

Abstract

Neurosurgery is one of the most complex and delicate fields of medicine. Errors in this specialty can lead to devastating consequences, including permanent disability or death. This work is based on the analysis of fatal outcomes according to the data from the Mandatory Health Insurance Fund (MHIF) of the Republic of Kazakhstan (RK). It examines the types of neurosurgical errors and possible solutions for preventing these errors. In everyday practice, the term "medical error" implies the absence of signs of intent and negligence, and instead refers to errors associated with various causes leading to adverse outcomes. The problem of adverse outcomes depends on the quality of the diagnostic and therapeutic process, as well as factors such as gender, age, nosological forms, timing of hospitalization, and more.
An analysis of fatal cases in certain regions of the RK regarding neurosurgical services was conducted. The sample was carried out comprehensively using data from the MHIF of the RK. The sample included fatal outcomes of patients with neurosurgical pathology who were treated in various clinics across the republic. The quality of treatment was assessed using the MHIF's tabular form, which includes passport data, objective status, clinical examination methods, and treatment methods. The treatment outcome was evaluated on a three-point scale of compliance or non-compliance with standards and treatment protocols. The analysis determined the presence of treatment defects, the presence or absence of "medical errors," and more. Conducting such studies will help prevent adverse outcomes in neurosurgery.

Keywords:

medical error, mortality, MHIF, neurosurgery.

Author Biographies

M.Zh. Mirzabayev, Kazakh National Medical University named after S.D. Asfendiyarov

Department of Neurosurgery named after. S.K. Akshulakov 

E.K. Dyusembekov, Kazakh National Medical University named after S.D. Asfendiyarov

Department of Neurosurgery named after. S.K. Akshulakov 

A.R. Khalimov, Kazakh National Medical University named after S.D. Asfendiyarov

Department of Neurosurgery named after. S.K. Akshulakov

Z.M. Turdiev, Kazakh National Medical University named after S.D. Asfendiyarov

Department of Neurosurgery named after. S.K. Akshulakov

References

1. Шарабчиев Ю.Т. Врачебные ошибки и дефекты оказания медицинской помощи: социально-экономические аспекты и потери общественного здоровья. Международные обзоры: клиническая практика и здоровье. 2013;6(6):14-31.

2. Thomasson GO. Participatory risk management: promoting physician compliance with practice guidelines. It. Comm. J. Qual. Improv. 1994;70(6):317- 329.

3. Задворная О.Л., Восканян Ю.Э., Шикина И.Б., Борисов К. Н. Социально-экономические аспекты последствий медицинских ошибок в медицинских организациях. МИР (Модернизация. Инновации. Развитие). 2019;10(1):99–113.

4. Windrum B. It’s Time to Account for Medical Error in «Top Ten Causes of Death». Charts Commentary. Participatory Medicine. 2013. Available from: https://participatorymedicine.org/journal/opinion/commentary/2013/04/24/its-time-to-account-for-medical-error-in-top-ten-causes-of-death-charts/

5. Шарабчиев Ю.Т. Врачебные ошибки и дефекты оказания медицинской помощи: социально-экономические аспекты и потери общественного здоровья. Международные обзоры: клиническая практика и здоровье.2013;6(6):14-31.

6. Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, Hebert L, Localio AR, Lawthers AG, at al. Incidence of Adverse Events and Negligence in Hospitalized Patients: Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. New Engl. J. Med. 1991;324:370-376. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199102073240604

7. Feil M. Distractions and Their Impact on Patient Safety. Pa Patient Saf Advis. 2013;10(1):1-10.

8. Сергеев В.В., Захаров С.О. Медицинские и юридические аспекты врачебных ошибок. Здравоохранение РФ. 2000;1:7-9.

9. Иманкулова А.С., Джумалиева Г.А., Маанаев Т.И., Боронбаева Э.К. Управление качеством медицинской помощи в многопрофильном стационаре. Международный журнал прикладных и фундаментальных исследований. 2022;3:27-31.

10. EGOV. Обязательное социальное медицинское страхование. Реестр государственных услуг от 19.03.2024 г. Правительство для граждан.

11. Ni M, Mackenzie H, Widdison A, Jenkins JT, Mansfield S, Dixon T, et al. What errors make a laparoscopic cancer surgery unsafe? An ad hoc analysis of competency assessment in the National Training Programme for laparoscopic colorectal surgery in England. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(3):1020-1027. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4289-4

12. Bonrath EM, Dedy NJ, Zevin B, Grantcharov TP. Defining technical errors in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(8):2678-2691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2827-5

Published

2024-10-03

How to Cite

Мирзабаев, М., Е. Дюсембеков, А. Халимов, and З. Турдиев. “ANALYSIS OF MORTALITY IN THE NEUROSURGICAL SERVICE IN SOME REGIONS OF KAZAKHSTAN ”. Euroasian Health Journal, vol. 3, no. 3, Oct. 2024, pp. 140-4, doi:10.54890/1694-8882-2024-3-140.

Issue

Section

ISSUES OF NEUROSURGERY