MODERN ASPECTS OF CRANIOPLASTY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54890/1694-8882-2024-3-72Abstract
Research into carnioplasty methods began in ancient times; according to archaeological research, the use of cranioplasty dates back to 7000 BC. Thus, cranioplasty was used by many ancient civilizations, including the Incas, Britons, Asians, North Africans and Polynesians.
Indications for cranioplasty are the protection of the underlying brain parenchyma, since the absence of a bone flap and deformation of the brain in the postoperative period can lead to the development of post-trepanation syndrome, including various manifestations such as headache, occurrence of convulsive syndrome, behavioral disorders, weather dependence. Closing skull bone defects through reconstruction leads to normalization of intracranial pressure, restoring cerebrospinal fluid and hemodynamics, and improves cerebral metabolism. Cranioplasty has a significant impact on the quality of life of patients,
Authors came to the conclusion that today it remains relevant, despite the development of new techniques and the use of new materials for cranioplasty, there are no specific algorithms and recommendations for the selection of materials.
Keywords:
cranioplasty, autoplasty, alloplasty, heteroplasty, implants, titanium plates, health, surgery.References
1. World Health Organization. World Health Statistics 2024. Geneva: WHO; 2024. Available from: https://www.who.int/data/gho/whs-annex/
2. Копорушко Н.А., Ступак В.В., Мишинов С.В., Орлов К.Ю., Астраков С.В., Вардосанидзе В.К. и др. Этиология и эпидемиология приобретенных дефектов костей черепа, полученных при различной патологии центральной нервной системы, и число больных, нуждающихся в их закрытии, на примере крупного промышленного города. Современные проблемы науки и образования. 2019;2:120-130. https://doi.org/10.17513/spno.28660
3. Aydin S, Kucukyuruk B, Abuzayed B, Aydin S, Sanus GZ: Cranioplasty: review of materials and techniques. J Neurosci Rural Pract.2011;2(2):162–167. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-3147.83584 3
4. Kennedy KAR. Primitive Surgery: Skills Before Science. Spencer L. Rogers. Am Anthropol. 1987;89(1):217–218. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1987.89.1.02a00830
5. Courville CB: Cranioplasty in prehistoric times. Bull Los Angel Neuro Soc. 1959;24(1):1–8.
6. Durand JL, Renier D, Marchac D. [The history of cranioplasty]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 1997;42(1):75–83. French.
7. Baldo S, Tacconi L. Effectiveness and safety of subcutaneous abdominal preservation of autologous bone flap after decompressive craniectomy: a prospective pilot study. World Neurosurg. 2010;73(5):552-556. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.wneu.2010.02.018
8. Choban PS, Flancbaum L. The impact of obesity on surgical outcomes: a review. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;185(6):593-603. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1072-7515(97) 00109-9
9. Rosinski CL, Chaker AN, Zakrzewski J, Geever B, Patel S, Chiu RG, et al. Autologous Bone Cranioplasty: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis of Frozen and Subcutaneous Bone Flap Storage Methods. World Neurosurgery. 2019;131:e312-e320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.139
10. Grant GA, Jolley M, Ellenbogen RG, Roberts TS, Gruss JR, Loeser JD. Failure of autologous bone-assisted cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy in children and adolescents. J Neurosurg. 2004;100 (2 Suppl Pediatrics):163-168. https://doi.org/10.3171/ped.2004.100.2.0163
11. Malcolm JG, Rindler RS, Chu JK, Chokshi F, Grossberg JA, Pradilla G, et al. Early cranioplasty is associated with greater neurological improvement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurgery. 2018;82(3):278–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyx182
12. Munroe AR. The operation of cartilage-cranioplasty. Can Med Assoc. 1924;14(1):47-49.
13. Koenig WJ, Donovan JM, Pensler JM. Cranial bone grafting in children. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;95(1):1-4. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199501000-00001
14. Stieglitz LH, Fung C, Murek M, Fichtner J, Raabe A, Beck J. What happens to the bone flap? Long-term outcome after reimplantation of cryoconserved bone flaps in a consecutive series of 92 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2015;157(2):275-280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-014-2310-7
15. Mishinov SV, Stupak VV, Mamonova NV, Panchenko AA, Krasovsky IB, Lazurenko DV. Methods for three-dimensional prototyping and printing in reconstructive neurosurgery Biomedical Engineering. 2017;51(2):106–10.https://doi.org/10. 1007/s10527-017-9694-7
16. Гаврилова Л.О., Мишинов С.В., Аронов А.М., Мамонова Е.В., Мамонова Н.В., Гриф А.М. Разработка автоматизированной информационной системы проектирования и моделирования индивидуальных имплантатов, получаемых аддитивными методами, на примере замещения дефектов черепа. Международный журнал прикладных и фундаментальных исследований. 2017;11-2:209–213.
17. Кравчук А.Д., Потапов А.А., Панченко В.Я., Комлев В.С., Новиков М.М., Охлопков В.А. и др. Аддитивные технологии в нейрохирургии. Вопросы нейрохирургии им. Н.Н. Бурденко. 2018;82(6):97-104. https://doi.org/10.17116/ neiro20188206197
18. Мишинов С.В., Ступак В.В., Копорушко Н.А. Краниопластика: обзор методик и новые технологии в создании имплантатов. Современное состояние проблемы. Политравма. 2018;4:82–89.
19. Нагибович О.А., Свистов Д.В., Пелешок С.А., Коровин А.Е., Городков Е.В. Применение технологии 3D-печати в медицине. Клиническая патофизиология. 2017;23(3):14–22.
20. Redfern RM, Pullhorn H. Cranioplasty. Neurobiology. 2007;7:32-34.
21. Macksey LF. Surgical Procedures and Anesthetic Implications: A Handbook of Nurse Anesthesia Practice. Sudbury USA; Jones & Bartlett. 2011. 937 p.
22. Мишинов С.В., Ступак В.В., Копорушко Н.А., Панченко А.А., Красовский И.Б., Десятых И.В. Трехмерное моделирование и печать в нейрохирургии. В кн.: VIII Всероссийский съезд нейрохирургов. СПб; 2018:169.
23. Мишинов С.В., Ступак В.В., Мамуладзе Т.З., Копорушко Н.А., Мамонова Н.В., Панченко А.А. и др. Использование трехмерного моделирования и трехмерной печати в обучении нейрохирургов. Международный журнал прикладных и фундаментальных исследований. 2016;11(часть 6):1063–7.
24. Chobulov SA, Kravchuk AD, Potapov AA, Likhterman LB, Maryahin AD, Sinbukhova EV. Modern aspects of reconstructive surgery of skull defects. Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2019;83(2):115‑124. (In Russ., In Engl.). https://doi.org/10.17116/neiro201983021115
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
