DELIVERY OF PREGNANT WOMEN WITH ANTENATAL FETAL DEATH IN THE PRESENCE OF A UTERINE SCAR AFTER CAESAREAN SECTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54890/.v2i2.1000Abstract
The question of choosing a method for terminating an undeveloped pregnancy in the second trimester of pregnancy in women with a uterine scar after cesarean section remains debatable. Target. To assess the efficacy and safety of medical abortion in patients with antenatal fetal death at 27-28 weeks of gestation and a uterine scar after a previous caesarean section. Materials and methods. An unblinded prospective cohort study was conducted (pregnant women and physicians were aware of the method of abortion). We included 15 patients with antenatal fetal death at 27-28 weeks of gestation and a uterine scar after caesarean section. A combination of mifepristone and misoprostol was used for medical termination of pregnancy. A clinical and statistical evaluation of the obtained data was carried out. Results. With medical abortion, the average duration of labor was 8.5 (95% CI 7.346–9.168) hours. The volume of postpartum hemorrhage was within 280.0 (95% CI 250.0–400.0) ml. Positive effect was achieved in 100% of cases. Pathology associated with separation of the placenta was detected in 2 (13.3%) cases, in these cases, manual separation of the placenta and removal of the afterbirth were performed. Conclusion. Medical abortion in patients with one uterine scar and antenatal fetal death at 27-28 weeks of gestation should be performed in all cases, provided there are no contraindications for vaginal delivery.
Keywords:
antenatal fetal death, caesarean section, abortion, mifepristone, misoprostol, cervical maturity, II trimester.References
1. Ремнева О.В., Ершова Е.Г., Чернова А.Е., Кравцова Е.С., Брусенцов И.Г. Антенатальная гибель доношенного плода: факторы риска, возможности телемедицины в ее прогнозировании. Современные проблемы науки и образования. 2018;5. Режим доступа: https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=28031. [Remneva OV, Ershova EG, Chernova AE, Kravtsova ES, Brusentsov IG. Antenatal death of a full-term fetus: risk factors, the possibility of telemedicine in its prediction. Modern problems of science and education. 2018;5. Available from: https://science education.ru/ru/article/ view?id=28031. (in Russ.)].
2. Flenady V, Koopmans L, Middleton P, Frоen JF, Smith GC, Gibbons K et al. Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: asystematic review and metaanalysis. Lancet. 2011;377:1331-1340.
3. Reddy UM, Laughon SK, Sun L, Troendle J, Willinger M, Zhang J. Prepregnancy risk factors for antepartum stillbirth in the United States. Obstet. Gynecol. 2010;116:5:1119-1126.
4. Perin J, Mulick A, Yeung D, Villavicencio F, Lopez G, Strong KL et al. Global, regional, and national causes of under-5 mortality in 2000-19: an updated systematic analysis with implications for the Sustainable Development Goals. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2022;6(2):106-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(21)00311-4
5. World Health Organization. Stillbirth. Geneva: WHO; Available from: https://www.who.int/health topics/stillbirth#tab =tab_1
6. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations for care of the preterm or low birth weight infant. Geneva: WHO; 2022. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240058262/
7. Blencowe H, Okwaraji Y, Hug L, You D. Stillbirth Definition and Data Quality Assessment for Health Information Management Systems. A Guideline. s. 6 https://data.unicef.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Stillbirth-definition-and-data-quality-assessment_20220921.pdf
8. Указ Президента Кыргызской Республики. Национальная стратегия охраны репродуктивного здоровья населения Кыргызской Республики до 2015 года. № 387 от 15 июля 2006 года. Режим доступа: http://cbd.minjust.gov.kg/act/view/ru-ru/4506?cl=ru-ru. [Ukaz Prezidenta Kyrgyzskoj Respubliki. Nacional'naya strategiya ohrany reproduktivnogo zdorov'ya naseleniya Kyrgyzskoj Respubliki do 2015 goda. № 387 ot 15 iyulya 2006 goda. (in Russ.)].
9. Центр электронного здравоохранения. Здоровье населения и деятельность организаций здравоохранения КР за 2021 год. Режим доступа: http://cez.med.kg/здоровье-населения-и-деятельность-оз/ [Centr elektronnogo zdravoohraneniya. Zdorov'e naseleniya i deyatel'nost' organizacij zdravoohraneniya KR za 2021 god. (in Russ.)].
10. Национальный статистический комитет Кыргызской Республики. Женщины и мужчины Кыргызской Республики: 2016–2020. Бишкек; 2021. 307 с. Режим доступа: http://www.stat.kg/media/publicationarchive/b057b115-c40b-4180-ae16-28ec7e459117.pdf
11. Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller A-B, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014. PLоS ONE. 2016;11:2. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148343
12. Всемирная организация здравоохранения. Заявление ВОЗ о частоте кесарева сечения. Женева:ВОЗ;2015. Режим доступа: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_health/csstatement/en/
13. Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse D, Barros A, Barros FC, Juan L et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. The Lancet. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7
14. World Health Organization. Maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response: materials to support implementation. Geneva: WHO; 2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240036666
15. ACOG. Practice Bulletin No. 102: Management of Stillbirth. Obstet. Gynecol. 2009; 113(3): 748-761. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31819e9ee2
16. RCOG. Late intrauterine fetal death and stillbirth (Green-top Guideline No. 55). Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. 2010. Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg55/
17. Министерство здравоохранения Кыргызской Республики. Клинический протокол «Идукция родов». Бишкек. 2016; 44с. Режим доступа: https://kyrgyzstan.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/индукция.pdf
18. Morris JL, Winikoff B, Dabash R, Weeks A, Faundes A, Gemzell-Danielsson K at al. FIGO’s updated recommendations for misoprostol used alone in gynecology and obstetrics. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2017;138(3)363–366. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/ijgo.12181
19. Newcombe RG. Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: Comparison of seven methods. Statistics in Medicine. 1998;17:857-872. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980430)17:8<857:AID-SIM777> 3.0.CO;2-E
20. Всемирная организация здравоохранения. Руководство по уходу при прерывании беременности: основные положения [Abortion care guideline: executive summary]. Женева: ВОЗ; 2022 г. 19 с. Режим доступа: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/352893
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
