ANALYSIS OF PHYSICIANS’ OPINIONS ON THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN RADIOLOGY, SURVEY RESULTS IN THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54890/1694-8882-2025-2-18Abstract
Artificial intelligence will not fully replace radiologists, but it will reshape their role—especially in image interpretation and patient care. Patients are often unsure how to respond to artificial intelligence related errors, while radiologists believe they must retain control and responsibility over diagnostic processes. Therefore, strategies for ethical accountability and stronger artificial intelligence education in medical training are essential. Collaboration between radiologists and IT specialists is crucial for patient-centered integration of these technologies. Objective. This study aimed to analyze physicians' perceptions of the use of artificial intelligence in radiology. A quantitative survey was conducted among 51 practicing physicians, including radiologists. The questionnaire explored issues such as patient data confidentiality, absence of human oversight, risk of skill loss, and interest in artificial intelligence applications. Results. The majority of respondents expressed positive attitudes towards artificial intelligence, highlighting its potential to enhance diagnostic speed and accuracy. However, concerns remain about loss of clinical skills, data privacy, and lack of human control. Over 60% of participants were interested in learning how artificial intelligence can be used in chest X-ray interpretation. Conclusion. Artificial intelligence is seen as a supportive tool, not a replacement for physicians. Successful implementation requires ethical guidelines, legal regulation, and the education of healthcare professionals to ensure safe and effective artificial intelligence integration.
Keywords:
artificial intelligence, radiology, physicians’ opinion, diagnostic imaging, AI in healthcareReferences
1. Al Meslamani AZ. Beyond implementation: the long-term economic impact of AI in healthcare. J Med Econ. 2023;26(1):1566-1569. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 13696998.2023.2285186
2. Banerjee A, Sarangi PK, Kumar S. Medical Doctors’ Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Healthcare. Cureus. 2024;16(9):e70508. https://doi.org/10.7759 /cureus.70508
3. Bajwa J, Munir U, Nori A, Williams B. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: transforming the practice of medicine. Future Healthc J. 2021;8(2):e188–94. https:// doi.org/10.7861/fhj.2021-0095
4. Borda A, Molnar A, Neesham C, Kostkova P. Ethical issues in AI-enabled disease surveillance: perspectives from global health. Appl Sci. 2022;12(8):3890. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12083890
5. Cè M, Ibba S, Cellina M, Tancredi C, Fantesini A, Fazzini D, et al. Radiologists' perceptions on AI integration: An in-depth survey study. Eur J Radiol. 2024;177:111590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111590
6. Alowais SA, Alghamdi SS, Alsuhebany N, Alqahtani T, Alshaya AI, Almohareb SN, et al. Revolutionizing healthcare: the role of artificial intelligence in clinical practice. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):689. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04698-z
7. Koski E, Murphy J. AI in Healthcare. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021;284:295-299. https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI210726
8. Reddy S, Fox J, Purohit MP. Artificial intelligence-enabled healthcare delivery. J R Soc Med. 2019;112(1):22-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0141076818815510
9. Yang L, Ene IC, Arabi Belaghi R, Koff D, Stein N, Santaguida PL. Stakeholders' perspectives on the future of artificial intelligence in radiology: a scoping review. Eur Radiol. 2022;32(3):1477-1495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08214-z
10. Victor Mugabe K. Barriers and facilitators to the adoption of artificial intelligence in radiation oncology: A New Zealand study. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2021;18:16-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2021.03.004
11. Strohm L, Hehakaya C, Ranschaert ER, Boon WPC, Moors EHM. Implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in radiology: hindering and facilitating factors. Eur Radiol. 2020;30(10):5525-5532. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00330-020-06946-y
12. Morrison K. Artificial intelligence and the NHS: a qualitative exploration of the factors influencing adoption. Future Healthc J. 2021;8(3):e648-e654. https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.2020-0258
13. Warsavage T Jr, Xing F, Barón AE, Feser WJ, Hirsch E, Miller YE, et al. Quantifying the incremental value of deep learning: Application to lung nodule detection. PLoS One. 2020;15(4):e0231468. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0231468
14. Davenport T, Kalakota R. The potential for artificial intelligence in healthcare. Future Healthc J. 2019;6(2):94-98. https://doi.org/10.7861/futurehosp.6-2-94
15. Capobianco E. High-dimensional role of AI and machine learning in cancer research. Br J Cancer. 2022;126(4):523-532. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-021-01689-z
16. Fischer UM, Shireman PK, Lin JC. Current applications of artificial intelligence in vascular surgery. Semin Vasc Surg. 2021;34(4):268-271. https://doi.org/ 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2021.10.008
17. Ben Ali W, Pesaranghader A, Avram R, Overtchouk P, Perrin N, Laffite S, et al. Implementing Machine Learning in Interventional Cardiology: The Benefits Are Worth the Trouble. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:711401. https://doi.org/ 10.3389/fcvm.2021.711401
18. Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015;10:53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0
19. Sogani J, Allen B Jr, Dreyer K, McGinty G. Artificial intelligence in radiology: the ecosystem essential to improving patient care. Clin Imaging. 2020;59(1):A3-A6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2019.08.001
20. He J, Baxter SL, Xu J, Xu J, Zhou X, Zhang K. The practical implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in medicine. Nat Med. 2019;25(1):30-36. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0307-0
21. Liberati EG, Ruggiero F, Galuppo L, Gorli M, González-Lorenzo M, Maraldi M, et al. What hinders the uptake of computerized decision support systems in hospitals? A qualitative study and framework for implementation. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):113. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0644-2
22. Lugtenberg M, Weenink JW, van der Weijden T, Westert GP, Kool RB. Implementation of multiple-domain covering computerized decision support systems in primary care: a focus group study on perceived barriers. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015;15:82. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-015-0205-z
23. Bezemer T, de Groot MCH, Blasse E, ten Berg M, Kappen T, Bredenoord A, et al (2019) A Human(e) factor in clinical decision support systems. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(3):e11732. https://doi.org/10.2196/11732
24. Tamori H, Yamashina H, Mukai M, Morii Y, Suzuki T, Ogasawara K. Acceptance of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Among Japan's Doctors and the Public: A Questionnaire Survey. JMIR Hum Factors. 2022;9(1):e24680. https://doi.org/10.2196/24680